I have bought a new edition of "The Rapture Question" since the copy I was working from was borrowed. I noticed that some of the author's earlier statements have been modified. He has begun to answer the questions asked by Post-Trib people. I don't quite know how to feel about this. One the one hand, clearly our questions are hitting home or he would have been able to ignore them. Does he really believe what he writes now? Or is he simply squirming under scrutiny? If he keeps revising how soon will his position be Post-Trib? It makes it rather hard to argue with an opponent who changes position! By argue, I mean to meet idea with idea in a civilized tone with graciousness on both sides.

I have acquired a copy of C. S. Lewis' "Screwtape Letters" read by Joss Ackland, to which I am listening as I write. Mr. Lewis understood argument with grace.